Last edited: Jun 15, I imagine if you are being photographed you have a good idea what is about to happen, and you can take 'precautions' if necessary - as opposed to watching tv then suddenly they cut to a scene with prolific flashing going on. Iccz Member. Most paps know who they're shooting and will know of major celebs who have epilepsy.
I seem to recall hearing one of the Beckham's children has epilepsy but not sure what happens with that one. I believe wearing sunglasses can help as well. My gfs cousin has epilepsy and it's horrible. Don't underestimate the usefulness of that warning. IronGiant Moderator. JAMFish72 said:. I think this is the perfect case of a Nanny State gone mad, frankly. Click to expand PoochJD Distinguished Member. Jamfish, JAMFish72 said:.
Tempest Member. If a sudden flash, a peanut, or a pair of rubber gloves, make you keel over and almost die. I think it's natures subtle way of trying to tell you something. NewMan Well-known Member. Perhaps these people should buy Apple products as we all know how much Apple hate anything related to Flash on their systems. Most prerecorded programming from the BBC is tested for flashing patterns etc that could set off a fit.
The footage can then be amended or warnings issued. If you're doing a report from a major film premiere you won't have any control over flashes, so you wil hear warnings more often from this kind of programming. Where the Nanny State comes into it, I have no idea. All seems pretty sensible to me. And so a bulletin aimed at millions of viewers contains one sentence of script relevant to a handful. And, paradoxically, the news items intended to be of most general interest — George Clooney at a movie premiere, a scandal-hit celebrity leaving a hotel in a storm of paparazzi lightning — are also those of most concern, for a different reason, to this niche sub-section of the audience.
These are the parameters of television regulation. This article is more than 11 years old. Mark Lawson. If they don't take those steps, they lead themselves open to potential litigation. Read about the London promo video which was broadcast without being tested, and subsequently found to be possible trigger material, after everybody involved thought each other was responsible for the testing. So how did all these people manage before these intrusive warnings started popping up everywhere?
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment. Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy! Already have an account? Sign in here. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings , otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. General Discussions Search In. The following clip contains flash photography! New Topics Topics. Pets In The s.
My Family's Football History. Nhs Dentist. Simon Palmer. Joe Lycett: More, More, More! Sign in to follow this Followers
0コメント